diff options
author | Elena Bolshakova <lena-san@yandex-team.ru> | 2015-06-10 11:34:14 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Elena Bolshakova <lena-san@yandex-team.ru> | 2015-06-10 11:34:14 +0300 |
commit | 193f66553fc114e83e7c4cfb4607e4a1b57c4f09 (patch) | |
tree | 30988e25d31ed6dff83cf409ad093c3c7ec9322c /scala.html.markdown | |
parent | 676568cca8731d0dbb2d2bdeff08cc092d283177 (diff) | |
parent | 5086480a04d27cff2380f04609210082000538d4 (diff) |
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/adambard/learnxinyminutes-docs
Diffstat (limited to 'scala.html.markdown')
-rw-r--r-- | scala.html.markdown | 126 |
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/scala.html.markdown b/scala.html.markdown index 529347be..e6638121 100644 --- a/scala.html.markdown +++ b/scala.html.markdown @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ val sq: Int => Int = x => x * x // Anonymous functions can be called as usual: sq(10) // => 100 -// If your anonymous function has one or two arguments, and each argument is +// If each argument in your anonymous function is // used only once, Scala gives you an even shorter way to define them. These // anonymous functions turn out to be extremely common, as will be obvious in // the data structure section. @@ -198,8 +198,10 @@ weirdSum(2, 4) // => 16 // The return keyword exists in Scala, but it only returns from the inner-most -// def that surrounds it. It has no effect on anonymous functions. For example: -def foo(x: Int) = { +// def that surrounds it. +// WARNING: Using return in Scala is error-prone and should be avoided. +// It has no effect on anonymous functions. For example: +def foo(x: Int): Int = { val anonFunc: Int => Int = { z => if (z > 5) return z // This line makes z the return value of foo! @@ -405,41 +407,55 @@ val otherGeorge = george.copy(phoneNumber = "9876") // 6. Pattern Matching ///////////////////////////////////////////////// -val me = Person("George", "1234") +// Pattern matching is a powerful and commonly used feature in Scala. Here's how +// you pattern match a case class. NB: Unlike other languages, Scala cases do +// not need breaks, fall-through does not happen. -me match { case Person(name, number) => { - "We matched someone : " + name + ", phone : " + number }} - -me match { case Person(name, number) => "Match : " + name; case _ => "Hm..." } +def matchPerson(person: Person): String = person match { + // Then you specify the patterns: + case Person("George", number) => "We found George! His number is " + number + case Person("Kate", number) => "We found Kate! Her number is " + number + case Person(name, number) => "We matched someone : " + name + ", phone : " + number +} -me match { case Person("George", number) => "Match"; case _ => "Hm..." } +val email = "(.*)@(.*)".r // Define a regex for the next example. -me match { case Person("Kate", number) => "Match"; case _ => "Hm..." } +// Pattern matching might look familiar to the switch statements in the C family +// of languages, but this is much more powerful. In Scala, you can match much +// more: +def matchEverything(obj: Any): String = obj match { + // You can match values: + case "Hello world" => "Got the string Hello world" -me match { case Person("Kate", _) => "Girl"; case Person("George", _) => "Boy" } + // You can match by type: + case x: Double => "Got a Double: " + x -val kate = Person("Kate", "1234") + // You can specify conditions: + case x: Int if x > 10000 => "Got a pretty big number!" -kate match { case Person("Kate", _) => "Girl"; case Person("George", _) => "Boy" } + // You can match case classes as before: + case Person(name, number) => s"Got contact info for $name!" + // You can match regular expressions: + case email(name, domain) => s"Got email address $name@$domain" + // You can match tuples: + case (a: Int, b: Double, c: String) => s"Got a tuple: $a, $b, $c" -// Regular expressions -val email = "(.*)@(.*)".r // Invoking r on String makes it a Regex -val serialKey = """(\d{5})-(\d{5})-(\d{5})-(\d{5})""".r // Using verbatim (multiline) syntax + // You can match data structures: + case List(1, b, c) => s"Got a list with three elements and starts with 1: 1, $b, $c" -val matcher = (value: String) => { - println(value match { - case email(name, domain) => s"It was an email: $name" - case serialKey(p1, p2, p3, p4) => s"Serial key: $p1, $p2, $p3, $p4" - case _ => s"No match on '$value'" // default if no match found - }) + // You can nest patterns: + case List(List((1, 2,"YAY"))) => "Got a list of list of tuple" } -matcher("mrbean@pyahoo.com") // => "It was an email: mrbean" -matcher("nope..") // => "No match on 'nope..'" -matcher("52917") // => "No match on '52917'" -matcher("52752-16432-22178-47917") // => "Serial key: 52752, 16432, 22178, 47917" +// In fact, you can pattern match any object with an "unapply" method. This +// feature is so powerful that Scala lets you define whole functions as +// patterns: +val patternFunc: Person => String = { + case Person("George", number) => s"George's number: $number" + case Person(name, number) => s"Random person's number: $number" +} ///////////////////////////////////////////////// @@ -449,6 +465,7 @@ matcher("52752-16432-22178-47917") // => "Serial key: 52752, 16432, 22178, 47917 // Scala allows methods and functions to return, or take as parameters, other // functions or methods. +val add10: Int => Int = _ + 10 // A function taking an Int and returning an Int List(1, 2, 3) map add10 // List(11, 12, 13) - add10 is applied to each element // Anonymous functions can be used instead of named functions: @@ -476,7 +493,7 @@ sSquared.reduce (_+_) // The filter function takes a predicate (a function from A -> Boolean) and // selects all elements which satisfy the predicate List(1, 2, 3) filter (_ > 2) // List(3) -case class Person(name:String, phoneNumber:String) +case class Person(name:String, age:Int) List( Person(name = "Dom", age = 23), Person(name = "Bob", age = 30) @@ -507,7 +524,60 @@ for { n <- s; nSquared = n * n if nSquared < 10} yield nSquared // 8. Implicits ///////////////////////////////////////////////// -// Coming soon! +/* WARNING WARNING: Implicits are a set of powerful features of Scala, and + * therefore it is easy to abuse them. Beginners to Scala should resist the + * temptation to use them until they understand not only how they work, but also + * best practices around them. We only include this section in the tutorial + * because they are so commonplace in Scala libraries that it is impossible to + * do anything meaningful without using a library that has implicits. This is + * meant for you to understand and work with implicts, not declare your own. + */ + +// Any value (vals, functions, objects, etc) can be declared to be implicit by +// using the, you guessed it, "implicit" keyword. Note we are using the Dog +// class from section 5 in these examples. +implicit val myImplicitInt = 100 +implicit def myImplicitFunction(breed: String) = new Dog("Golden " + breed) + +// By itself, implicit keyword doesn't change the behavior of the value, so +// above values can be used as usual. +myImplicitInt + 2 // => 102 +myImplicitFunction("Pitbull").breed // => "Golden Pitbull" + +// The difference is that these values are now eligible to be used when another +// piece of code "needs" an implicit value. One such situation is implicit +// function arguments: +def sendGreetings(toWhom: String)(implicit howMany: Int) = + s"Hello $toWhom, $howMany blessings to you and yours!" + +// If we supply a value for "howMany", the function behaves as usual +sendGreetings("John")(1000) // => "Hello John, 1000 blessings to you and yours!" + +// But if we omit the implicit parameter, an implicit value of the same type is +// used, in this case, "myImplicitInt": +sendGreetings("Jane") // => "Hello Jane, 100 blessings to you and yours!" + +// Implicit function parameters enable us to simulate type classes in other +// functional languages. It is so often used that it gets its own shorthand. The +// following two lines mean the same thing: +def foo[T](implicit c: C[T]) = ... +def foo[T : C] = ... + + +// Another situation in which the compiler looks for an implicit is if you have +// obj.method(...) +// but "obj" doesn't have "method" as a method. In this case, if there is an +// implicit conversion of type A => B, where A is the type of obj, and B has a +// method called "method", that conversion is applied. So having +// myImplicitFunction above in scope, we can say: +"Retriever".breed // => "Golden Retriever" +"Sheperd".bark // => "Woof, woof!" + +// Here the String is first converted to Dog using our function above, and then +// the appropriate method is called. This is an extremely powerful feature, but +// again, it is not to be used lightly. In fact, when you defined the implicit +// function above, your compiler should have given you a warning, that you +// shouldn't do this unless you really know what you're doing. ///////////////////////////////////////////////// |