1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
|
---
language: Coq
filename: learncoq.v
contributors:
- ["Philip Zucker", "http://www.philipzucker.com/"]
---
The Coq system is a proof assistant. It is designed to build and verify mathematical proofs. The Coq system contains the functional programming language Gallina and is capable of proving properties about programs written in this language.
Coq is a dependently typed language. This means that the types of the language may depend on the values of variables. In this respect, it is similar to other related languages such as Agda, Idris, F*, Lean, and others. Via the Curry-Howard correspondence, programs, properties and proofs are formalized in the same language.
Coq is developed in OCaml and shares some syntactic and conceptual similarity with it. Coq is a language containing many fascinating but difficult topics. This tutorial will focus on the programming aspects of Coq, rather than the proving. It may be helpful, but not necessary to learn some OCaml first, especially if you are unfamiliar with functional programming. This tutorial is based upon its OCaml equivalent
The standard usage model of Coq is to write it with interactive tool assistance, which operates like a high powered REPL. Two common such editors are the CoqIDE and Proof General Emacs mode.
Inside Proof General `Ctrl+C Ctrl+<Enter>` will evaluate up to your cursor.
```ocaml
(*** Comments ***)
(* Comments are enclosed in (* and *). It's fine to nest comments. *)
(* There are no single-line comments. *)
(*** Variables and functions ***)
(* The Coq proof assistant can be controlled and queried by a command language called
the vernacular. Vernacular keywords are capitalized and the commands end with a period.
Variable and function declarations are formed with the Definition vernacular. *)
Definition x := 10.
(* Coq can sometimes infer the types of arguments, but it is common practice to annotate
with types. *)
Definition inc_nat (x : nat) : nat := x + 1.
(* There exists a large number of vernacular commands for querying information.
These can be very useful. *)
Compute (1 + 1). (* 2 : nat *) (* Compute a result. *)
Check tt. (* tt : unit *) (* Check the type of an expressions *)
About plus. (* Prints information about an object *)
(* Print information including the definition *)
Print true. (* Inductive bool : Set := true : Bool | false : Bool *)
Search nat. (* Returns a large list of nat related values *)
Search "_ + _". (* You can also search on patterns *)
Search (?a -> ?a -> bool). (* Patterns can have named parameters *)
Search (?a * ?a).
(* Locate tells you where notation is coming from. Very helpful when you encounter
new notation. *)
Locate "+".
(* Calling a function with insufficient number of arguments
does not cause an error, it produces a new function. *)
Definition make_inc x y := x + y. (* make_inc is int -> int -> int *)
Definition inc_2 := make_inc 2. (* inc_2 is int -> int *)
Compute inc_2 3. (* Evaluates to 5 *)
(* Definitions can be chained with "let ... in" construct.
This is roughly the same to assigning values to multiple
variables before using them in expressions in imperative
languages. *)
Definition add_xy : nat := let x := 10 in
let y := 20 in
x + y.
(* Pattern matching is somewhat similar to switch statement in imperative
languages, but offers a lot more expressive power. *)
Definition is_zero (x : nat) :=
match x with
| 0 => true
| _ => false (* The "_" pattern means "anything else". *)
end.
(* You can define recursive function definition using the Fixpoint vernacular.*)
Fixpoint factorial n := match n with
| 0 => 1
| (S n') => n * factorial n'
end.
(* Function application usually doesn't need parentheses around arguments *)
Compute factorial 5. (* 120 : nat *)
(* ...unless the argument is an expression. *)
Compute factorial (5-1). (* 24 : nat *)
(* You can define mutually recursive functions using "with" *)
Fixpoint is_even (n : nat) : bool := match n with
| 0 => true
| (S n) => is_odd n
end with
is_odd n := match n with
| 0 => false
| (S n) => is_even n
end.
(* As Coq is a total programming language, it will only accept programs when it can
understand they terminate. It can be most easily seen when the recursive call is
on a pattern matched out subpiece of the input, as then the input is always decreasing
in size. Getting Coq to understand that functions terminate is not always easy. See the
references at the end of the article for more on this topic. *)
(* Anonymous functions use the following syntax: *)
Definition my_square : nat -> nat := fun x => x * x.
Definition my_id (A : Type) (x : A) : A := x.
Definition my_id2 : forall A : Type, A -> A := fun A x => x.
Compute my_id nat 3. (* 3 : nat *)
(* You can ask Coq to infer terms with an underscore *)
Compute my_id _ 3.
(* An implicit argument of a function is an argument which can be inferred from contextual
knowledge. Parameters enclosed in {} are implicit by default *)
Definition my_id3 {A : Type} (x : A) : A := x.
Compute my_id3 3. (* 3 : nat *)
(* Sometimes it may be necessary to turn this off. You can make all arguments explicit
again with @ *)
Compute @my_id3 nat 3.
(* Or give arguments by name *)
Compute my_id3 (A:=nat) 3.
(* Coq has the ability to extract code to OCaml, Haskell, and Scheme *)
Require Extraction.
Extraction Language OCaml.
Extraction "factorial.ml" factorial.
(* The above produces a file factorial.ml and factorial.mli that holds:
type nat =
| O
| S of nat
(** val add : nat -> nat -> nat **)
let rec add n m =
match n with
| O -> m
| S p -> S (add p m)
(** val mul : nat -> nat -> nat **)
let rec mul n m =
match n with
| O -> O
| S p -> add m (mul p m)
(** val factorial : nat -> nat **)
let rec factorial n = match n with
| O -> S O
| S n' -> mul n (factorial n')
*)
(*** Notation ***)
(* Coq has a very powerful Notation system that can be used to write expressions in more
natural forms. *)
Compute Nat.add 3 4. (* 7 : nat *)
Compute 3 + 4. (* 7 : nat *)
(* Notation is a syntactic transformation applied to the text of the program before being
evaluated. Notation is organized into notation scopes. Using different notation scopes
allows for a weak notion of overloading. *)
(* Imports the Zarith module containing definitions related to the integers Z *)
Require Import ZArith.
(* Notation scopes can be opened *)
Open Scope Z_scope.
(* Now numerals and addition are defined on the integers. *)
Compute 1 + 7. (* 8 : Z *)
(* Integer equality checking *)
Compute 1 =? 2. (* false : bool *)
(* Locate is useful for finding the origin and definition of notations *)
Locate "_ =? _". (* Z.eqb x y : Z_scope *)
Close Scope Z_scope.
(* We're back to nat being the default interpretation of "+" *)
Compute 1 + 7. (* 8 : nat *)
(* Scopes can also be opened inline with the shorthand % *)
Compute (3 * -7)%Z. (* -21%Z : Z *)
(* Coq declares by default the following interpretation scopes: core_scope, type_scope,
function_scope, nat_scope, bool_scope, list_scope, int_scope, uint_scope. You may also
want the numerical scopes Z_scope (integers) and Q_scope (fractions) held in the ZArith
and QArith module respectively. *)
(* You can print the contents of scopes *)
Print Scope nat_scope.
(*
Scope nat_scope
Delimiting key is nat
Bound to classes nat Nat.t
"x 'mod' y" := Nat.modulo x y
"x ^ y" := Nat.pow x y
"x ?= y" := Nat.compare x y
"x >= y" := ge x y
"x > y" := gt x y
"x =? y" := Nat.eqb x y
"x <? y" := Nat.ltb x y
"x <=? y" := Nat.leb x y
"x <= y <= z" := and (le x y) (le y z)
"x <= y < z" := and (le x y) (lt y z)
"n <= m" := le n m
"x < y <= z" := and (lt x y) (le y z)
"x < y < z" := and (lt x y) (lt y z)
"x < y" := lt x y
"x / y" := Nat.div x y
"x - y" := Init.Nat.sub x y
"x + y" := Init.Nat.add x y
"x * y" := Init.Nat.mul x y
*)
(* Coq has exact fractions available as the type Q in the QArith module.
Floating point numbers and real numbers are also available but are a more advanced
topic, as proving properties about them is rather tricky. *)
Require Import QArith.
Open Scope Q_scope.
Compute 1. (* 1 : Q *)
Compute 2. (* 2 : nat *) (* only 1 and 0 are interpreted as fractions by Q_scope *)
Compute (2 # 3). (* The fraction 2/3 *)
Compute (1 # 3) ?= (2 # 6). (* Eq : comparison *)
Close Scope Q_scope.
Compute ( (2 # 3) / (1 # 5) )%Q. (* 10 # 3 : Q *)
(*** Common data structures ***)
(* Many common data types are included in the standard library *)
(* The unit type has exactly one value, tt *)
Check tt. (* tt : unit *)
(* The option type is useful for expressing computations that might fail *)
Compute None. (* None : option ?A *)
Check Some 3. (* Some 3 : option nat *)
(* The type sum A B allows for values of either type A or type B *)
Print sum.
Check inl 3. (* inl 3 : nat + ?B *)
Check inr true. (* inr true : ?A + bool *)
Check sum bool nat. (* (bool + nat)%type : Set *)
Check (bool + nat)%type. (* Notation for sum *)
(* Tuples are (optionally) enclosed in parentheses, items are separated
by commas. *)
Check (1, true). (* (1, true) : nat * bool *)
Compute prod nat bool. (* (nat * bool)%type : Set *)
Definition my_fst {A B : Type} (x : A * B) : A := match x with
| (a,b) => a
end.
(* A destructuring let is available if a pattern match is irrefutable *)
Definition my_fst2 {A B : Type} (x : A * B) : A := let (a,b) := x in
a.
(*** Lists ***)
(* Lists are built by using cons and nil or by using notation available in list_scope. *)
Compute cons 1 (cons 2 (cons 3 nil)). (* (1 :: 2 :: 3 :: nil)%list : list nat *)
Compute (1 :: 2 :: 3 :: nil)%list.
(* There is also list notation available in the ListNotations modules *)
Require Import List.
Import ListNotations.
Compute [1 ; 2 ; 3]. (* [1; 2; 3] : list nat *)
(*
There are a large number of list manipulation functions available, including:
• length
• head : first element (with default)
• tail : all but first element
• app : appending
• rev : reverse
• nth : accessing n-th element (with default)
• map : applying a function
• flat_map : applying a function returning lists
• fold_left : iterator (from head to tail)
• fold_right : iterator (from tail to head)
*)
Definition my_list : list nat := [47; 18; 34].
Compute List.length my_list. (* 3 : nat *)
(* All functions in coq must be total, so indexing requires a default value *)
Compute List.nth 1 my_list 0. (* 18 : nat *)
Compute List.map (fun x => x * 2) my_list. (* [94; 36; 68] : list nat *)
Compute List.filter (fun x => Nat.eqb (Nat.modulo x 2) 0) my_list. (* [18; 34] : list nat *)
Compute (my_list ++ my_list)%list. (* [47; 18; 34; 47; 18; 34] : list nat *)
(*** Strings ***)
Require Import Strings.String.
(* Use double quotes for string literals. *)
Compute "hi"%string.
Open Scope string_scope.
(* Strings can be concatenated with the "++" operator. *)
Compute String.append "Hello " "World". (* "Hello World" : string *)
Compute "Hello " ++ "World". (* "Hello World" : string *)
(* Strings can be compared for equality *)
Compute String.eqb "Coq is fun!" "Coq is fun!". (* true : bool *)
Compute "no" =? "way". (* false : bool *)
Close Scope string_scope.
(*** Other Modules ***)
(* Other Modules in the standard library that may be of interest:
• Logic : Classical logic and dependent equality
• Arith : Basic Peano arithmetic
• PArith : Basic positive integer arithmetic
• NArith : Basic binary natural number arithmetic
• ZArith : Basic relative integer arithmetic
• Numbers : Various approaches to natural, integer and cyclic numbers (currently
axiomatically and on top of 2^31 binary words)
• Bool : Booleans (basic functions and results)
• Lists : Monomorphic and polymorphic lists (basic functions and results),
Streams (infinite sequences defined with co-inductive types)
• Sets : Sets (classical, constructive, finite, infinite, power set, etc.)
• FSets : Specification and implementations of finite sets and finite maps
(by lists and by AVL trees)
• Reals : Axiomatization of real numbers (classical, basic functions, integer part,
fractional part, limit, derivative, Cauchy series, power series and results,...)
• Relations : Relations (definitions and basic results)
• Sorting : Sorted list (basic definitions and heapsort correctness)
• Strings : 8-bits characters and strings
• Wellfounded : Well-founded relations (basic results)
*)
(*** User-defined data types ***)
(* Because Coq is dependently typed, defining type aliases is no different than defining
an alias for a value. *)
Definition my_three : nat := 3.
Definition my_nat : Type := nat.
(* More interesting types can be defined using the Inductive vernacular. Simple enumeration
can be defined like so *)
Inductive ml := OCaml | StandardML | Coq.
Definition lang := Coq. (* Has type "ml". *)
(* For more complicated types, you will need to specify the types of the constructors. *)
(* Type constructors don't need to be empty. *)
Inductive my_number := plus_infinity
| nat_value : nat -> my_number.
Compute nat_value 3. (* nat_value 3 : my_number *)
(* Record syntax is sugar for tuple-like types. It defines named accessor functions for
the components. Record types are defined with the notation {...} *)
Record Point2d (A : Set) := mkPoint2d { x2 : A ; y2 : A }.
(* Record values are constructed with the notation {|...|} *)
Definition mypoint : Point2d nat := {| x2 := 2 ; y2 := 3 |}.
Compute x2 nat mypoint. (* 2 : nat *)
Compute mypoint.(x2 nat). (* 2 : nat *)
(* Types can be parameterized, like in this type for "list of lists
of anything". 'a can be substituted with any type. *)
Definition list_of_lists a := list (list a).
Definition list_list_nat := list_of_lists nat.
(* Types can also be recursive. Like in this type analogous to
built-in list of naturals. *)
Inductive my_nat_list := EmptyList | NatList : nat -> my_nat_list -> my_nat_list.
Compute NatList 1 EmptyList. (* NatList 1 EmptyList : my_nat_list *)
(** Matching type constructors **)
Inductive animal := Dog : string -> animal | Cat : string -> animal.
Definition say x :=
match x with
| Dog x => (x ++ " says woof")%string
| Cat x => (x ++ " says meow")%string
end.
Compute say (Cat "Fluffy"). (* "Fluffy says meow". *)
(** Traversing data structures with pattern matching **)
(* Recursive types can be traversed with pattern matching easily.
Let's see how we can traverse a data structure of the built-in list type.
Even though the built-in cons ("::") looks like an infix operator,
it's actually a type constructor and can be matched like any other. *)
Fixpoint sum_list l :=
match l with
| [] => 0
| head :: tail => head + (sum_list tail)
end.
Compute sum_list [1; 2; 3]. (* Evaluates to 6 *)
(*** A Taste of Proving ***)
(* Explaining the proof language is out of scope for this tutorial, but here is a taste to
whet your appetite. Check the resources below for more. *)
(* A fascinating feature of dependently type based theorem provers is that the same
primitive constructs underly the proof language as the programming features.
For example, we can write and prove the proposition A and B implies A in raw Gallina *)
Definition my_theorem : forall A B, A /\ B -> A := fun A B ab => match ab with
| (conj a b) => a
end.
(* Or we can prove it using tactics. Tactics are a macro language to help build proof terms
in a more natural style and automate away some drudgery. *)
Theorem my_theorem2 : forall A B, A /\ B -> A.
Proof.
intros A B ab. destruct ab as [ a b ]. apply a.
Qed.
(* We can prove easily prove simple polynomial equalities using the automated tactic ring. *)
Require Import Ring.
Require Import Arith.
Theorem simple_poly : forall (x : nat), (x + 1) * (x + 2) = x * x + 3 * x + 2.
Proof. intros. ring. Qed.
(* Here we prove the closed form for the sum of all numbers 1 to n using induction *)
Fixpoint sumn (n : nat) : nat :=
match n with
| 0 => 0
| (S n') => n + (sumn n')
end.
Theorem sum_formula : forall n, 2 * (sumn n) = (n + 1) * n.
Proof. intros n. induction n.
- reflexivity. (* 0 = 0 base case *)
- simpl. ring [IHn]. (* induction step *)
Qed.
```
With this we have only scratched the surface of Coq. It is a massive ecosystem with many interesting and peculiar topics leading all the way up to modern research.
## Further reading
* [The Coq reference manual](https://coq.inria.fr/refman/)
* [Software Foundations](https://softwarefoundations.cis.upenn.edu/)
* [Certified Programming with Dependent Types](http://adam.chlipala.net/cpdt/)
* [Mathematical Components](https://math-comp.github.io/mcb/)
* [Coq'Art: The Calculus of Inductive Constructions](http://www.cse.chalmers.se/research/group/logic/TypesSS05/resources/coq/CoqArt/)
* [FRAP](http://adam.chlipala.net/frap/)
|